Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development.

Source: recentieltsexamquestions

Writing Task 2 (India, PB)
Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development. While others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The advent of globalization gives us many opportunities to access cultures from many parts of the world. Some people believe that this is an optimistic opportunity for the development of national economies, as well as for the expansion of many opportunities. While others argue that the disappearance of cultural identity could have happened. From my perspective, I think that business and cultural exchanges between countries certainly have more positive effects than drawbacks.

On the one hand, the expansion of business and intercultural communications is a positive feature of modern life. Firstly, the growth of foreign companies in developing countries has brought employment opportunities in both rural and urban areas. For example, many factories in India require a huge number of employees despite the lack of academic standards. Secondly, thanks to globalization, national and local tourism will develop, and the meaning of life will be improved by the enormous revenue of international friends. In addition, local crafts and traditional foods along with national cultures could be spread out of the outside world and bring many opportunities for development.

On the other hand, it would be an exaggeration to say that these developments will lead to the loss of a strong sense of identity in countries. For instance, the locals have embraced the change but still proudly maintain traditional cultural traits. In India, some youngsters wear traditional clothes from other countries to take photos, but that doesn’t mean they don’t respect and take pride in the core values ​​of their country. Furthermore, many of them also promote and develop their cultural properties through media sources that advertise to people in the rest of the world. Therefore, multicultural society integration plays a fundamental role in the modern era that we should be open-minded and have an accepting point of view being the bottom line.

To conclude, I would contend that the process of integration has encouraged various advantages rather than drawbacks. If indigenous citizens really respect and protect the spirit of national customs, the growth of contacts in commerce and culture will never erode national identity.

One Comment

  1. Since multilateral relations serve many countries to come together for several purposes, the attitude to this type of interaction varies among people. Some people are highly satisfied with positive implications of multicultural development while others stubbornly support national identities. Though there is a concern of losing the native identity, in my opinion, people’s interaction from different cultures and nations rather comes up with mutual benefits. I am going to elucidate both views and my humble opinion with relevant arguments.

    Unlike isolated countries, multicultural countries benefit from their partners with different business ethics, investment opportunities and open trade. Consequently, people are also affected by business relations such as importing and exporting goods and working in joint stock companies in order to improve their well-being. In a dynamic environment, people learn more about each other’s culture and become more tolerant and behave more consciously in a community. For example, United Arab Emirates was bombarded by a hail of direct foreign investments and know-how in the late of 20th century and as a result, it has turned into one of the business and cultural centres of the world. As a result, both local and foreign inhabitants take advantage of working and living in a diverse atmosphere.

    However, patriotic people oppose multiculturalism supposing that national sovereignty will gradually disappear leaving its place to other cultures. These people are too worried about the young generation who doesn’t fully perceive some fundamentals of the culture. Because budding generation is prone to change long-rooted customs with more innovative and novice tendency since they see no sensible meaning. In fact, most of underdeveloped countries applause this approach and multiculturalism is the slow process in these societies.

    To conclude, both group of people are right for themselves depending on their choice to be conservative or innovative. I firmly believe that integrating into the world with culture might have an optimum solution to conservative countries. Because globalization is inevitable, and countries need to contact each other in order to meet their demands better.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *