Writing Task 2
⇨ You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
| Money spent on space exploration is a complete waste. Governments could better spend this money on other things to benefit the nation. To what extent do you agree or disagree? |
⇨Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your knowledge or experience.
⇨Write at least 250 words.
The topic of whether money spent on space exploration is a waste or a worthwhile investment has long been debated. While it is true that governments could allocate these funds to address immediate societal needs, I believe that there should be a balance in both portions.
Firstly, it is no exaggeration to point out that space exploration brings technological advancements that benefit various industries on Earth. Many everyday technologies, were initially used for space research. To exemplify, satellite technology, which was developed through space exploration efforts, plays a crucial role in global communications, enabling internet connectivity in remote and underserved areas. Modern communication is, in fact, a result of the investment and efforts dedicated to space exploration. Nevertheless, data reveals that a country spends just a tiny fraction of its national budget on space and research, and redirecting this relatively small amount would not significantly solve societal problems but could stifle the innovations that space exploration fosters. Therefore, space exploration is far from a complete waste.
However, critics argue that the money spent on space exploration could be better utilized to address immediate problems such as poverty, healthcare, and education. They emphasize that millions of people around the world lack access to necessities like clean drinking water and adequate food resulting in countless deaths from hunger and preventable diseases every year. Critics point out that the resources allocated to space programs could instead be used to provide essential services and infrastructure to those in need. For instance, investing in clean water projects could drastically reduce waterborne illnesses, while funding healthcare initiatives could improve medical facilities and access to life-saving treatments They argue that prioritizing the well-being of people on Earth should take precedence over exploring outer space.
In conclusion, governments should ensure that immediate human needs are met while also investing in space exploration to secure future innovations and solutions that can enhance the quality of life on Earth.
