Discussion Essay Template: Band 7
Introduction
Opinions are divided on whether A or B represents the most effective approach. While some people argue that A offers certain advantages, I am more inclined to support B, mainly because reason 1 and reason 2.
Body Paragraph 1 (Opposing View – 100+ words)
To begin with, a considerable number of people believe that A is the more reasonable option, and they present several arguments to support their stance. Firstly, they contend that explain reason clearly and in detail. This is because add deeper explanation showing why they think this is valid. Furthermore, supporters of this view argue that give another strong reason, which they believe strengthens their position. For example, provide a realistic situation, study, or observation. As a result, people who hold this viewpoint feel that A provides clear advantages and should be valued more highly.
Body Paragraph 2 (Your View – 100+ words)
On the other hand, It seems to me that B is more useful, as it offers broader and more sustainable benefits. Firstly, explain your strongest point with detail, showing exactly how it contributes to a positive outcome. Moreover, add a second well-developed reason, highlighting why this approach is more effective in the long term. For instance, provide an example, evidence, or realistic scenario demonstrating the success of B. This example should reinforce why your view is more convincing. Consequently, it becomes clear that B is a more reliable and impactful approach compared to A, particularly when considering long-term results.
Conclusion (Band 7)
In conclusion, having considered both perspectives, although A has certain merits, I remain convinced that your opinion, primarily because reason 1 and reason 2.
Questions:
| Some countries have legal ages at which people can drink. Other countries believe not having strict laws is a better policy. Discuss both and give your opinion. |
Opinions are divided on how a country should regulate the drinking habits of its citizens. While some people argue that strict legal ages are necessary to prevent alcohol-related problems, others believe that a more flexible approach is preferable. From my perspective, moderate regulation is the better policy, mainly because it encourages responsible behaviour and reduces illegal alcohol consumption among young people.
To begin with, a significant number of people argue that countries must set legal drinking ages, and they provide several reasons for this stance. Firstly, they claim that strict age limits protect young people from the physical and mental harm caused by alcohol consumption. Furthermore, supporters argue that legal restrictions can help reduce accidents, violence, and long-term health problems related to drinking. For example, countries with rigid drinking laws, such as the United States, often see lower rates of alcohol-related traffic incidents among teenagers. Consequently, from their perspective, having a clear legal age is essential for public safety.
On the other hand, from my perspective, more flexible policies regarding drinking are preferable. Firstly, they encourage young people to develop responsible drinking habits gradually rather than perceiving alcohol as a forbidden taboo, which can lead to binge drinking. Moreover, flexible regulations allow authorities to focus on education and awareness campaigns, which can be more effective in the long term. Another consideration is, in some cultures, alcohol consumption is deeply embedded in tradition, and since it cannot be completely prohibited in these communities, adopting flexible policies is essential. As a result, moderate policies appear to be a more practical and sustainable approach.
To recapitulate, having considered both perspectives, although strict legal drinking ages have certain merits, I remain convinced that flexible regulation is the better approach, primarily because it encourages responsible behaviour and allows for cultural practices without promoting illegal consumption.